Legal Opinion

Brindle v. Harter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1965No. 20,082PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrime, P. J.

Appellant instituted this action below to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a collision between an automobile driven by appellant, Edwin D. Brindle, and one operated by appellee, Robert Lee Harter. Trial was had by jury which returned a verdict for the appellee. Appellant then filed a motion for a new trial which was subsequently overruled.

This appeal followed in which the assignment of error was the overruling of said motion. The specifications of the motion were numerous, but we find it necessary to rule only upon appellant’s contention that the court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Westfall v. WaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCullomIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Dotterer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ballard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rondinelli v. BowdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Jackson v. BeardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Aldridge v. Abram & Hawkins Excavating Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Evans Ex Rel. Evans v. BreedenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API