Legal Opinion
United States v. 3969.59 Acres of Land
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 6, 1944No. 1529PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
This action was brought by the United States of America to ascertain and award just compensation for the taking of certain lands required by the Government for Public use.
A good many different tracts of land were involved in the entire proceeding, but all that the Court is concerned with is three parcels owned by E. J. Bloom and wife and designated and referred to throughout the trial as parcels 106a, 106b and 116. The cases having been tried before a jury, with a verdict fixing the compensation for the taking of the lands.
Parcel 106a comprises two units, one of 295…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Welch v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- A. & A. Tool & Supply Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.