Legal Opinion

Jones v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 1949No. 4-9013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunaway, J.

Did enactment of § 24 of the Uniform Sales Act change the common-law rale in Arkansas that an infant may disaffirm a contract of sale of personal property and recover the property from a third party who was an innocent purchaser for value without notice from the infant’s transferee? "We hold that § 24 of Act 428 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1941 (Ark. Stats., 1947, § 68-1424) did change the common-law rule and that is determinative of this appeal.

On October 28, 1948, Renaford Caldwell, a minor, by Rena S. Caldwell, as next friend, brought this action against Herbert and Kent Jones,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Rowe v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Davie v. PadgettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. Harrod v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  5. Tobin v. SpannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Portland School District No. 4 v. Drew County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Beene v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Wallace v. FrancisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API