Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Ryan
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1980No. 11972PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
This proceeding in habeas corpus stems from State ex rel. Stanhope v. Pratt, 533 S.W.2d 567 (Mo. banc 1976) in which it was established that under the conditions therein defined a party who fails to pay maintenance or support as required by an order of the court may be held in contempt of court as provided in § 452.345. 1 The petition in this cause alleged that the petitioner was being held by virtue of an “Order of Contempt” and a capias warrant for arrest, a copy of the order and warrant being attached to and incorporated in the petition. The petition then set forth several…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Teefey v. TeefeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- In Re Marriage of VanetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Stanhope v. PrattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Curtis v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hunt v. MorelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Burrell-El v. AutreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Tannenbaum v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Brown v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Owsley v. OwsleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.