Del Haya v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The convictions under review are reversed for a new trial because the trial court admitted into evidence a photograph of the defendant, which had not been previously supplied as required in pre-trial discovery, without first conducting a Richardson hearing. Zeigler v. State, 402 So.2d 365 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1035, 102 S.Ct. 1739, 72 L.Ed.2d 153 (1982); Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1977); Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
While we have previously certified to the supreme court the question of whether the rule of per se Richardson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zeigler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Cumbie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Sedelbauer v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Balboa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.