Ex Parte Save Our Streams, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Rule 39, A.R.App.P., "Review of Decisions of Courts of Appeals," is admittedly not organized in the clearest fashion. From its title, the practitioner might logically assume that resort to this rule would be necessary only after obtaining a final disposition of a case in an intermediate appellate court. The first ten subsections of Rule 39, (a)-(j), would substantiate that assumption. In the eleventh subsection, (k), however, the second and third sentences set forth what must be done while making an application for rehearing in the intermediate appellate court in order to have this Court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte YarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- DISPOS. SOLUTIONS-LANDFILL v. Town of LowndesboroCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte State Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Winchester v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- City of Brundidge v. Alabama Department of Environmental ManagementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.