Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Town of Dysart

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1929No. 39069PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

The public improvement. here concerned con-slated of a main and lateral sewer, a disposal plant and lift sta~ tion. Authorization for this project originated July 16, 1919, when appellant's town couneil adopted an ordi~ nance establishing a sanitary sewer district, which included all the property in the incorporated town of Dysart. Immediately following that action by the council, a resolution of. necessity was introduced. In compliance with the law relating, to this subject-matter, a notice was duly given and published for a hearing upon the resolution of necessity. Appellee did not appear…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Bennett v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Shaver v. J. W. Turner Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. In re Appeal of AppleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Tjaden v. Town of WellsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodell v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Brenton v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Haugen v. Humboldt-Kossuth Joint Drainage District No. 2Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Dickey v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  5. Danielson v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API