Legal Opinion
Xuedan Wang v. Hearst Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 8, 2017No. Docket No. 16-3302PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
I
The question is whether Hearst furnishes bona fide for-credit internships or whether it exploits student-interns to avoid hiring and compensating entry-level employees. The factual record is voluminous and advances multiple -narratives, some of them contradictory; but the following essentials are undisputed.
Hearst maintained dozens of internship programs with its various print magazines. Each of five named appellants worked at one time as interns in one of these programs. These internships were unpaid, carried no expectation of eventual full-time employment, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barfield v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gorman v. Rensselaer Cnty.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Velarde v. GW GJ, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Div. 1181 A.T.U.-n.Y. Emps. Pension Fund v. City of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Mark Fochtman v. Hendren Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Brandi McKay v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.