Stewart v. Sciaccaluga

This is a suit for the price of a “No. 4 Estate Heatrola heater" and connections sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant at his residence No. 2701 De Soto street.

For answer the defendant admitted that he purchased the heater but denied that there was anything due thereon for the following reason: “That it was agreed that the heater was to be satisfactory to respondent and give the required temperature in order to heat the bedrooms of respondent’s residence properly and in a complete manner, but that, on the contrary, after several tests were made it was discovered that the said heater…