Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Heissner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1949No. 9710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND GRAY, Justice.

Appellant brought this suit against ap-pellees to set aside a deed executed 'by appellant and appellee Carl Putnam, whereby real and personal property was conveyed to appellee Bertha Heissner.

As grounds for setting aside the said deed, appellant alleged the property thereby conveyed was a part of the estate of Roger Putnam who died intestate; that appellant and appellee Carl Putnam are the only surviving heirs at law of Roger Putnam and, as such heirs, were seized of his entire estate; that Carl Putnam claimed two-thirds of said estate and that a controversy arose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. BiscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wise & Smoot, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Meader Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. DuPont v. Southern Nat. Bank of Houston, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API