Legal Opinion
Berg v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 29, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSweedler, J.
This is an action for disability benefits under two policies of insurance issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff. The parties have submitted their controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, the pertinent parts of which are as follows: “ B. That on March 9th, 1933, plaintiff became totally disabled and such disability continued and became presumptive permanent disability on June 9th, 1933, and such total and presumptive permanent disability continued and was existing at the time of the institution of this action.” “ E. That the only question for the Court to decide is, as to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldstein v. . Standard Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Marcus v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Aldrich v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Perlman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941