Legal Opinion

Kyselka v. First Nat. Bank of Pawhuska

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1950No. 33808PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties to this appeal occupy the same relative positions as in the trial court, and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively.

This is an action for a money judgment on a certificate of deposit which is as follows:

“Pawhus (hole) Oklahoma, Aug 4 1917 No. 120
“THIS CERTIFIES,

That Frank Kyselka $600

Has Deposited With

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK

of Pawhuska Oklahoma

Six Hundred & NO ......... DOLLARS, “Payable to the order of himself on the return of this Certificate properly endorsed, twelve months after date, with interest at 5 per (torn edge) cent, per annum. No interest paid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. v. Board of Ed.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Verdi v. Helper State BankUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Baxley Banking Co. v. GaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Downing v. First Bank in ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API