Legal Opinion
Megrabian v. Saenz
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 2005No. A104819PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
Welfare and Institutions Code sections 18938 and 18940 determine eligibility for benefits under California’s Cash Assistance Program for Aged, Blind, and Disabled Legal Immigrants (CAPI). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 18937 et seq.) An immigrant is eligible for CAPI benefits based in part on whether he or she “entered the United States on or after August 22, 1996.” (§ 18938, subd. (a)(2) & (3).) There are no California cases construing section 18938 or the phrase “entered the United States” as used in that statute.
Rita Saenz (Appellant) is director of the California Department of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Gerardo Parga-RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- In Re Social Services Payment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Diageo-Guinness Usa, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Opinion No. (2006), California Attorney General Reports2006