Citizens Against the Pellissippi Parkway Extension, Inc. v. Mineta
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Federal Highway Administration (the “FHWA”), in conjunction with federal and state agencies, issued a finding of no significant impact (“FONSI”) for a proposed 4.5 mile extension of a highway in Tennessee. Subsequently, a citizens group opposed to the extension brought suit in federal district court alleging that the agency’s finding violated NEPA because it did not address a specific federal regulation. The district court issued a broad preliminary injunction that prevented state or federal agencies…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Skf Usa Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Ethyl Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Belville Mining Company, Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Xue Y. Ren v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Coalition for the Advancement of Regional Transportation v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Citizens Against The Pellissippi Parkway Extension, Inc. v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Waterlegacy v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.