Dendy v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Walter Dendy and Neal Bross appeal their convictions for the murder of Leonard Houda. We affirm on all grounds raised by appellants, but write to address one point on appeal. Appellants contend that the trial judge erred in not disqualifying herself because of her prior involvement in this matter as a prosecutor. We disagree and affirm.
In the first trial of this matter, separate juries convicted Dendy of second degree murder and Bross of third degree murder. We reversed both convictions because appellants’ confessions, which were introduced at trial, had been obtained through use of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Chamberlain v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Jones v. City of Los Angeles Department of HousingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Zuchel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Duest v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009