Legal Opinion

Katz v. St. Mary Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 2003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Tamilia, J.

¶ 1 At the conclusion of a medical malpractice lawsuit, a jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee Dr. Snyder on the grounds that he did, in fact, obtain informed consent of appellant, Steven Katz, before performing a surgical procedure known as transurethral bladder neck incision. Appellants, Steven and Dorothy Katz, now appeal from the judgment entered thereafter. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of this case as follows:

[Appellants] filed a Complaint against St. Mary Hospital and Man I. Snyder, M.D. alleging a lack of informed consent and loss of consortium. Prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Beaumont v. ETL Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavidsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Alwine v. Sugar Creek Rest, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. E. Chaney v. Fairmount Park Real Estate CorporationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Spotts v. Small, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County2003
  5. Helfrick v. UPMC Shadyside Hospital, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API