Legal Opinion

Specktor v. North British & Mercantile Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1928No. Appeal, 181PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendant is a foreign fire insurance company. Alleging that, under the existing facts, it was not amenable to suit in this State, it entered an appearance de bene esse in the court below, and filed a petition asking that the service of the summons be stricken off. A rule to show cause was granted, which was later discharged, the court below saying: “Our conclusion is that the suit was properly brought in Philadelphia County, that the service was duly authorized to be made, and was properly made by the sheriff of Philadelphia County, and that the attack upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Wilson v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Stamper v. KogelschatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Bernhardt v. BassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Specktor v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Industrial Acceptance Corp. v. SicklerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Anderson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977
  5. Snyder v. McCanless, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API