Legal Opinion

Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. Dupuy

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

Motion by defendant, Jacques Dupuy, to vacate warrant of attachment and to set aside the service of the summons and complaint by publication is granted.

In this action only the fourth and fifth causes of action involve flus defendant. It is unnecessary to pass upon the arguments in support of the motion respecting the fifth cause of action which is asserted against this defendant and others inasmuch as the Appellate Division has ruled that that cause of action did not justify the issuance of the warrant previously granted as to a codefendant therein (Corcoran &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prentiss v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Wesley v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corcoran & Kostelanetz v. DupuyNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API