Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Milhollin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1948No. 16277Published

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The *197amendment to the traverse sought the right to establish an equitable lien for rents accruing prior to the date the title was registered. The right to such a lien is apparently predicated on the contention that Milhollin and Holton were solvent at the time the title was registered, but subsequently became insolvent. Assuming that the pleadings were sufficient to allege this change in conditions, such would not establish an equitable lien. Whatever condition existed between the parties to this proceeding as to a lien for prior rents, or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Josey v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  2. Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Johnson v. StancliffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Usry v. Hines-Yelton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Peterson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API