Legal Opinion
Cresskill Borough v. Dumont Borough
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 15, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 26 (1953)
100 A.2d 182
BOROUGH OF CRESSKILL, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BOROUGH OF DUMONT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 15, 1953.
Mr. Arthur J. O'Dea, attorney for plaintiffs Borough of Cresskill and Frank P. Ryer.
Mr. Frank H. Hennessy, attorney for plaintiffs Borough of Haworth and William Wendland and Marjorie Wendland.
Mr. William A. Fasolo, attorney for plaintiffs Borough of Demarest, Robert Austin, June Austin, Robert H. Jaeger, Helen…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Allen v. CoffelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Rowe v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Battaglia Fruit Co. v. City of MaitlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.