Legal Opinion

Raisler v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. 84-372PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

The United States District Court for the State of Montana has certified two questions to this Court from a federal action for personal *256injuries and a derivative third party suit for contribution or indemnity. The questions, as certified to us by the federal court, are:

1. When an injured employee sues a third party for damages and the third party joins the employer as a third party defendant seeking contribution or indemnity, is the assertion of Section 39-71-411, MCA, by the third party defendant employer as a defense, unconstitutional as it is applied to the third party plaintiff? Our answer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. White v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Pfost v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Plumb v. Fourth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Newville v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Williams v. White Mountain Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API