Legal Opinion

Engle v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1912No. Appeal, No. 170PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 170, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1907, No. 1025, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Theodore Engle v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 170, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1907, No. 1025, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Theodore Engle v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. On a rule for judgment for defendant n. o. v. Swearingen, P. J., filed the following opinion: The plaintiff, at the time of the injury of which he complains, was employed as a laborer by the Duquesne Brewery, whose plant was located on the south side of Mary Street between Twenty-first…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Swearingen, discharging the rule for judgment non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClure v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Hastings v. South Shore RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Nadazny v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Docheney v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API