Day v. Grisham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs’ Count I sought a declaration of easement by prescription over a strip of defendants’ land; alternatively, Count II sought the same by implication and Count III sought title by adverse possession. Plaintiffs were granted a prescriptive easement on Count I and defendants have appealed.
The disputed area is a 20-foot strip 800-feet long, extending from plaintiffs’ landlocked tract across defendants’ farm to a county road. In 1895 a larger tract was divided by conveyance into two separate tracts, and each subsequent owner of plaintiffs’ present tract has used…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barber v. Allright Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Guerin v. YocumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Glenville v. StrahlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Pendleton v. GundakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Behen v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Fenster v. HykenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Bryant v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Orla Holman Cemetery, Inc. v. Robert W. Plaster TrustSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.