Legal Opinion

Day v. Grisham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1978No. 39733PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs’ Count I sought a declaration of easement by prescription over a strip of defendants’ land; alternatively, Count II sought the same by implication and Count III sought title by adverse possession. Plaintiffs were granted a prescriptive easement on Count I and defendants have appealed.

The disputed area is a 20-foot strip 800-feet long, extending from plaintiffs’ landlocked tract across defendants’ farm to a county road. In 1895 a larger tract was divided by conveyance into two separate tracts, and each subsequent owner of plaintiffs’ present tract has used…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber v. Allright Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Guerin v. YocumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Glenville v. StrahlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Pendleton v. GundakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Behen v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Fenster v. HykenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Bryant v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Orla Holman Cemetery, Inc. v. Robert W. Plaster TrustSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API