Legal Opinion
Bresgal v. Brock
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 1, 1985No. Civ. 84-6315-EPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES M. BURNS, District Judge.
In this straightforward case, the court is called upon to define the term “agricultural employment” as it appears in the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA) 29 U.S.C. § 1802(3). The precise issue presented is whether workers who engage in forestry work, such as planting, clearing brush, and the like, are engaged in “agricultural employment” so as to make applicable the remedial provisions of the Act regulating labor contractors in that area. All parties agree the question is purely one of law, and therefore appropriate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ruben Bracamontes v. The Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bresgal v. BrockDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.