Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 13, 1984No. G79-369 CA6Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MILES, Chief Judge.

This action is brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., and the National Swine Flu Immunization Program Act, 42 U.S.C. § 247b. The plaintiff seeks damages for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a swine flu vaccination.

This action was filed on June 20, 1979, and was subsequently transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, In re Swine Flu…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Kathleen and Michael Hasler, (82-1126), (81-1584) v. United States of America, (81-1584), (82-1126)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Weissert v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Marvin T. Gates, of the Estate of Fae L. Gates, Deceased, and Marvin T. Gates, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API