Legal Opinion

People v. Burnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1962No. Crim. 7971PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Burnett and one Gallegos were charged in an indictment with the sale of heroin in violation of section 11501, Health and Safety Code. Following conviction by a jury, each defendant unsuccessfully moved for a new trial. Burnett alone appeals from the judgment and the order (denying a new trial). He claims entrapment as a matter of law; his other assignment of error relates to the failure of the court to send the jury back for further deliberations after an equivocal answer by one juror to the question, “Is that your verdict I ’ ’

The principal witness against appellant was one Franklin, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. State v. SchmelzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. NelsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chipman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API