Legal Opinion

Romatz v. Romatz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1959No. Docket 51, Calendar 47,706Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 Mich. 81 (1959)

94 N.W.2d 432

ROMATZ

v.

ROMATZ.

Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 47,706.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided January 12, 1959.

A. Albert Sugar, for plaintiff.

Joseph B. Bixler, for defendant.

BLACK, J.

Barden v. Northern Pacific R. Co., 154 US 288 (14 S Ct 1030, 38 L ed 992), provides an appropriate introduction to the ensuing confession of error. It follows (p 322):

"It is more important that the court should be right upon later and more elaborate consideration of the cases than consistent with previous declarations. Those doctrines only will eventually stand which bear the strictest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Maier Hanson v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Sovereign v. SovereignMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lindquist v. LindquistNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. Pretlow v. PretlowSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API