Legal Opinion

Miners & Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Mullins (In Re Mullins)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 9, 1985No. 19-70129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ■ AND ORDER

H. CLYDE PEARSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue for determination is whether Counsel for the Plaintiff, Miners and Mer chants Bank and Trust, has made out a case of excusable neglect which will permit the late filing of a Complaint objecting to dischargeability of a debt. Debtor/Defendants object and contend that excusable neglect has not been shown.

Briefly stated, the facts appear as follows. The Debtors, Rex and Carol Sue Mullins, filed their Chapter 7 petition in this Court on March 8, 1985. They listed Miners and Merchants Bank and Trust, the Plaintiff herein,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Roberts v. W. P. Ford & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. Vicente Pinero Schroeder v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re KleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  2. In Re EliscuUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Matter of DuesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. In Re HarveyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. Poe v. Rasnick (In re Rasnick)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API