Arthur J. Fritz & Co. v. United States

Newman, Judge:

Defendant has moved to strike the complaint filed in this action. The basis of the motion is that the complaint was filed by the firm of Glad & Tuttle, whereas the firm of Glad, Tuttle & White filed a notice of appearance for plaintiffs. Defendant contends that there is “no record of any notice of substitution filed with this Court replacing the firm of Glad, Tuttle & White, as attorney of record”. Admittedly, no notice of substitution, as provided for in rule 16.3 (f), has been filed.1

The Government’s position is that Glad, Tuttle & White is a law firm distinct and separate…