Legal Opinion

Greenhouse v. Greenhouse

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 2005No. 4D05-1587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER-CURIAM.

We reverse the temporary support order. The trial court abused its discretion-in ordering the husband to pay $3,000 per month in undifferentiated support to the wife, as there was no evidence in the record to support the conclusion that the husband had the ability to pay this amount. Further, in making the undifferentiated award, the trial court did not identify “which share of the award was for child support and which was intended to be alimony.” Blum v. Blum, 769 So.2d 1142, 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see Fleischfresser v. Accursio, 833 So.2d 803, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

KLEIN,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blum v. BlumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Fleischfresser v. AccursioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Maerssen v. GerdtsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Joshua S. Winegar v. Gabrielle D. WinegarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API