Lee v. Park Lane Togs, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The complaint is “based on unfair competition. It alleges that defendant has used the words “Park Lane” in its corporate name and trade-mark in selling women’s apparel, of the same quality and character as the merchandise manufactured and sold by plaintiff under plaintiff’s trade-mark “Park Lane”, that sales are made by defendant to the same class of retail outlets as those to which plaintiff’s are sold, and that the general public is misled and deceived into believing that the defendant’s affairs are those of the plaintiff and that defendant’s business is that of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Del Monte Special Food Co. v. California Packing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Ward Baking Co. v. Potter-Wrightington, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Chicago Furniture Forwarding Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Potter-Wrightington, Inc. v. Ward Baking Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Northmont Hosiery Corp. v. True Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1951