Legal Opinion

Goforth v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 17, 2009No. 5D08-196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawaya, J.

We review an order denying a motion for postconviction relief filed by Raymond Goforth pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motion contained fifteen grounds alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Two were denied after an evidentiary hearing, and the remainder were summarily denied. Of the numerous assertions of error raised by Goforth, 1 we believe that only one warrants reversal and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing. That error concerns the trial court’s summary denial of Goforth’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on counsel’s failure…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Peede v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Czubak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benjamin Davis Smiley, Jr. v. State of Florida & Benjamin Davis Smiley, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 2026
  2. STATE V. JENKINSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API