Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1935No. 24575PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. “In cases where suit shall be pending, or where judgment shall have been obtained, the plaintiff shall be entitled to the process of garnishment.” Code of 1933, § 46-101. “All debts owing to the defendant, and all property, money or effects of the defendant coming into the hands of the garnishee at the date of the service of the summons of garnishment or at any time from the date of said service to the date of the garnishee’s answer shall be subject to the process of garnishment.” § 46-201.

2. Where there is pending a tort action by the plaintiff against the defendant for damages by reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Westmoreland v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Bates & Co. v. ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Gamble v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. McElhaney v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Hodgson Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brenau College v. MinceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Ja-Be Distributors, Inc. v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API