Legal Opinion
United States v. Janson Strayhorn
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2014No. 12-4487, 12-4495PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from the convictions of Janson Strayhorn and Jimmy Strayhorn for the robbery of P & S Coins and a second planned robbery of All American Coins.
Regarding Janson Strayhorn’s appeal, we conclude that there was insufficient evidence to convict Janson Strayhorn of robbing P & S Coins. Thus, we hold that the district court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charges related to the P & S Coins robbery. The government did, however, present sufficient evidence to sustain the conspiracy and firearm convictions against Janson Strayhorn…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Wayne Morris MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Charles Walker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Jamar Travillion v. Superintendent Rockview SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- United States v. McDanielsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- United States v. Rodney VinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.