Legal Opinion

United States v. Cameron

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 12, 2010No. CR-09-24-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

Claiming the admission at trial of digital images and reports generated by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), Yahoo!, and Google would violate the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution and Rule 803(6) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, James Cameron moves in limine to exclude these exhibits. Based on the submissions of the parties, the Court dismisses Mr. Cameron’s motion because it preliminarily concludes that the contested reports and attachments are not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. People v. PierreNew York Supreme Court · 2016
  3. United States v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API