Legal Opinion

Walls v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 28, 1966No. [App. No. 75, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This petition for post conviction relief presents four contentions, all of which were considered by Judge Harris at a hearing where petitioner testified and called various witnesses. From denial of relief, petitioner seeks leave to appeal. He contends :

1. He was without counsel during his arrest and detention. There is, as yet, no constitutional requirement that a lawyer be furnished a person suspected of crime at the time of his arrest. Judge Harris found that petitioner did not make any statement to the police and did not request an attorney during his. detention following arrest. These…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hyde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Husk v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Evans v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Johns v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Ross v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. State v. HardyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Montgomery v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Cherrix v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API