Legal Opinion
State v. Timmerman
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 29, 1995No. 94-3374-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Herbert H. Timmerman appeals from that portion of a trial court order which denied him work-release privileges for child visitation purposes during his sixty-day confinement in the county jail, which was imposed as a condition of probation under §§ 973.09 and 303.08, STATS. Another portion of the order granted Timmerman work-release privileges for his regular employment. We reject Tim-merman's argument that the trial court misused its discretion when it failed to grant him release privileges for child visitation purposes. Therefore, we affirm the order.
Background
Pursuant to a plea agreement,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scheunemann v. City of West BendCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. HeynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Novak v. Madison Motel AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Bank & Trust v. Firstar Information Services, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Township of DelavanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Hartman v. Winnebago CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Village of Lannon v. Wood-Land Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.