Chirila v. Conforte
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Tudor Chirila appeals the district court’s dismissal of his second amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The defendants here (the English defendants) are all subjects of the United Kingdom. Chirila argues that the district court had personal jurisdiction based on the “effects” test. Chirila additionally contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying him leave to amend his complaint. We affirm.
I
This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether Chirila has made a prima facie showing of jurisdictional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7276, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,439 Elizabeth Ballard v. Michael E. Savage, and Royal Trust Bank (Austria)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Litig.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Arandell Corp. v. Xcel Energy, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Integrated Financial Associates, Inc. v. Blanchard (In re Blanchard)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Yalcin Ayasli v. Sezgin Baran Korkmaz, Kamil Feridun Ozkaraman, Fatih Akol, SBK Holdings A.S., SBK Holdings, USA, Inc., Bugaraj Elektronik Ticaret ve Bilisim Hizmetleri A.S., and Mega Varlik Yonetim, A.S.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.