Legal Opinion

Clay Drilling Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 6927Published

Petitioner had certain accounts on its books for money advanced to two individuals who were its stockholders at the time the advancements were made.

Read the full summary

Petitioner had certain accounts on its books for money advanced to two individuals who were its stockholders at the time the advancements were made. In 1938 these stockholders sold their stock to two other individuals and at the time of sale it was agreed by all parties, including petitioner, that the two debtors would be released from personal liability to pay the accounts and that in the future a certain percentage of commissions due to these two debtors by petitioner on oil drilling contracts tendered by them to petitioner should be applied as credits to the accounts. Thereafter the…

1Opinion of the Court

The Clay Drilling Company of Texas, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Clay Drilling Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6927

United States Tax Court

6 T.C. 324; 1946 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 279;

March 4, 1946, Promulgated

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Petitioner had certain accounts on its books for money advanced to two individuals who were its stockholders at the time the advancements were made. In 1938 these stockholders sold their stock to two other individuals and at the time of sale it was agreed by all parties, including petitioner, that the two debtors would be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riverview State Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  2. Clay Drilling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API