Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hale v. Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1958No. 6212Published

1Dissent

PHELPS and STRUCKMEYER, Justices

(dissenting).

Our major point of departure from the majority takes place in their treatment of the second assignment of error and begins with what constitutes, and what is the nature of, the real cause of action involved in this case. However, before launching into a discussion of our differences in that regard, we must clarify another minor point of disagreement that involves whether we are dealing with “plaintiffs” or “plaintiff” on this appeal. The majority opinion maintains that the court ordered stricken the names of decedent’s three children as party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Foley v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Sworski v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Konecny v. HohenschuhSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API