A.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for attempted burglary of a dwelling.1 The trial court erred by failing to conduct a “Richardson” hearing when it appeared at trial that the state committed a discovery violation by not revealing a statement made by appellant.
In response to the appellant’s demand for discovery, the state submitted the name and address of Officer Whitehurst as a witness. The state also responded that it was “unknown” whether the prosecution had possession, control or knowledge of any statements by the defendant. At trial, the officer testified that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Lavigne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Raffone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rainey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- M.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- AM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- MN v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998