Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reynolds-Penland Co. v. Hexter & Lobello

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1978No. 19337Published

1DissentGuittard, Chief Justice

I cannot agree that this is a proper case for summary judgment. In my opinion, the record presents fact issues or, at least a question of equitable discretion that could not properly be decided by the trial court on the summary-judgment proof.

The majority opinion approaches this case as if the principal question were whether neglect of the lessee “justifies” equitable relief. Such a statement of the question assumes a negative answer because, of course, the plaintiff’s neglect is never a ground of relief. As I see it, the question is rather whether the lessee’s forgetfulness bars equitable…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API