Chi Kee Pang v. Synlyco, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*977The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the instant action was time-barred under the applicable statutes of limitations. The cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract is barred by the six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 213 [2]). The plaintiffs contention…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jeffrey L. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC v. LajaunieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- EMD Construction Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- 37 Park Drive South, Inc. v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Prand Corp. v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bellissimo v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Mosab Construction Corp. v. Prospect Park Yeshiva, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Mizuno v. BarakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cataldo v. HerrmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Gleich v. HaenelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.