Legal Opinion

McCall v. Crocker

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1915No. File No. 3694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from- Circuit Court, Pennington County. Hon. Lüvi McGEB, Judge. In the matter of the election of directors and officers' of the Cumberlaind Mining & Milling Company, a corporation. From a judgment of the Circuit Court, in favor of Frank C. Crocker, A. M. McCall, and others appeal. Respondent submitted that: There are no assignments of error in appellant’s abstract or statement of the case. No specifications of error are referred to.

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

Appellants’ brief contains no- assignment of errors. There is therefore nothing before us for consideration. Attention was called to this defect by respondent, and, although appellants filed a reply brief, the defect was not remedied.'

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed. Sorg. v. Wells, 33 S. D. 142, 144 N. W. 918; State v. Johns, 25 S. D. 451, 127 N. W. 470; Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. Kelly, 23 S. D. 582, 122 N. W. 646; chapter 172, Laws 1913; Supreme Court rule S (140 N. W. viii).

POLLEY, J., not sitting.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams Bros. Lumber Co. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. JohnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sorg v. WellsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Crosse Rubber Mills Co. v. Dakota Wholesale Coffee Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Meeker v. City of MadisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Sigler v. LehrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915