Legal Opinion
Norris v. Payton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 14, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas —
Affirming.
The nature of this controversy and the subject-matter of the litigation, as well as the individuals composing the two contesting groups, are completely disclosed by our opinions in the cases of Payton v. Norris, 240 Ky. 555, 42 S. W. (2d) 723, and Maxey v. Payton, 248 Ky. 758, 59 S. W. (2d) 1005. Prom them it will appear that the controverted and litigated question is: Who has the right to extract the oil from under a 25-acre described tract of land located in Hart county, Ky., and formerly owned by a colored man by the name of Gr. H. Maxey?…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Price's Adm'r v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Stevens v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Mercer v. Mercer's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Torain v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Louisville & N. R. R. v. Ueltschi's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vaughn v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Morris v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
- Staton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- O. L. Cain's Administrator v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957