In re the Marriage of Grage

EDMONDS, J.,

specially concurring.

The majority says:

“In her second assignment of error, wife argues that the trial court erred in allowing husband to reduce his child support obligation by accounting for his direct contribution of clothing to the children. In the light of our disposition of the first assignment of error, this question is moot. However, because the trial court may be faced with this question again on remand, we address it briefly.

“The parties have had frequent disagreements regarding child support and who should pay for the children’s clothing. It is difficult to imagine just…