Austin v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
Marvin Austin was convicted by a jury of battery, a Class C felony.1 He urges the following alleged errors for our review:(1) Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction; and,(2) Whether the trial court erred in granting a motion in limine.
We affirm.
I
Sufficiency of Evidence
Austin first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. When this Court reviews such a challenge we neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses. We look to the evidence most favorable to the State and all the reasonable inferences therefrom.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lagenour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Gilliam v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Niehaus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garcia v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Whatley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Albright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. NorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Garcia v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.