Sentell v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Plaintiff sues to recover the loss sustained by him on account of the burning of 50 bales of his cotton after being loaded by his employees into two of defendant’s cars, which had been “spotted” by defendant’s train on a spur track that connects plaintiff’s gin with defendant’s main line three miles south of Dixie in Caddo parish.
The cars were left on the spur at plaintiff’s request November 12, 1931, and were loaded the following evening by 5 o’clock. There were 29 bales in one car and 21 bales in the other. The cars had been closed but not sealed. Both cars were discovered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- V. & A. Meyer & Co. v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
- W.H. C.B. Hodges v. Louisiana Ry. Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Whitehurst v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Noel Bros. v. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Creosote Works v. Boland Machine Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946