Legal Opinion · Dissent

I. Tanenbaum Son & Co. v. C. Ludwig Baumann & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1933Published

1Dissent

Hubbs, J. (dissenting).

This is a replevin action in which the > plaintiff has been awarded possession of a sprinkler system of the value of $8,000 together with damages amounting to $948.67 and costs and disbursements amounting to $162.35, or in the event that possession is not delivered to the plaintiff, the sum of $9,111.02.

The sprinkler system was installed by the plaintiff, an insurance broker, in buildings in the possession of the Brooklyn Furniture Company. The contract provided that title should remain in the plaintiff and that at the termination of the contract or breach or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Madfes v. Beverly Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Suydam v. Jenkins, SheriffThe Superior Court of New York City · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API