People v. Weinfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: As an expert in the field of podiatry, the People’s expert was qualified to give testimony as to the time sequence involved in the progress and repetitiveness of ingrown toenails. He eliminated the possibility of their recurrence and presence at such intervals as the defendant’s various claims represented, following his own examination of the patients on June 2, 1975. A treatment necessarily requires a condition to be treated and the absence of such a condition, in this case ingrown toenails, established the false…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Bel Air Equipment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. Bel Air Equipment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ChaitinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. BentleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. AbediNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. LinardosNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. DeLucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.